Illinois DUI Dismissal: How Cases End

Most Illinois DUI cases that end favorably for the defendant do not end in a jury acquittal. They end before trial, when a judge grants a motion the defense filed, a statutory deadline passes, or the Sangamon County State’s Attorney’s Office concludes it cannot prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Knowing which of these pressure points applies to a specific arrest, and knowing it early, is what separates a dismissed DUI from a conviction that follows someone for the rest of their life. Illinois does not allow a DUI conviction to be expunged or sealed once it is entered — and, as explained below, it does not allow a DUI supervision to be expunged or sealed either. That makes the pretrial fight the fight that matters.

Bottom Line: A DUI charge in Sangamon County can be dismissed through a successful motion to suppress evidence, a breath test that fails to meet Illinois State Police regulations or is shown to be unreliable, a missed speedy trial deadline, or a prosecutor’s own decision that the case cannot be proven. Winning your license suspension hearing is not the same thing as winning your criminal case, and court supervision is not the same thing as a dismissal either. Each path has its own rules, its own timeline, and its own evidence requirements.

Key Takeaways:

A motion to suppress under 725 ILCS 5/114-12 can end a DUI case if the initial stop or arrest was unlawful.
Breath results are admissible only if the State shows the test complied with Illinois State Police regulations — and even a fully compliant test can be attacked separately as unreliable, which is a distinct inquiry.
Video destroyed after the defense has requested it can get an officer barred from testifying about what the recording would have shown.
Illinois’ speedy trial statute (725 ILCS 5/103-5) dismisses a case outright if the State misses its 120- or 160-day deadline.
Winning a license suspension rescission hearing under 625 ILCS 5/2-118.1 does not dismiss the criminal DUI charge; they are separate proceedings.
Prosecutors sometimes dismiss DUI cases independently when they conclude the evidence cannot support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

Facing a DUI charge in Sangamon County right now? Call (217) 544-4057 for a free, confidential consultation. The earlier a defense attorney gets involved, the more of these avenues are still open.

What Does “DUI Dismissal” Actually Mean in Illinois?
How Does a Motion to Suppress Evidence Lead to a Dismissal?
Can a Faulty Breathalyzer Get an Illinois DUI Case Dismissed?
Is Winning My License Suspension Hearing the Same as Beating My DUI Charge?
What Happens If the State Misses Illinois’ Speedy Trial Deadline?
Why Do Prosecutors Actually Dismiss DUI Cases? A Former Prosecutor’s View
How Do the Different DUI Dismissal Avenues in Illinois Compare?
What If My Situation Doesn’t Fit the Standard Playbook?
Why Does DUI Dismissal Require Local, Sangamon County Experience?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What Does “DUI Dismissal” Actually Mean in Illinois?

A DUI dismissal means the court ends the criminal case against you without a conviction, either because the State asks to drop it (nolle prosequi) or because a judge grants a defense motion the State cannot overcome. That is different from an acquittal, which only happens after a full trial, and different from court supervision, which resolves the case only after you complete court-ordered conditions over months.

People searching for “how to get a DUI dismissed” are usually really asking about four separate things: the criminal charge under 625 ILCS 5/11-501, the civil license suspension under 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1, court supervision as a sentencing outcome, and expungement. Only the criminal charge can be “dismissed” in the technical sense; the suspension is rescinded, which is a different remedy in a different proceeding. Supervision ends in a dismissal of the charge, but only after conditions are satisfied — and it still cannot be expunged or sealed. Expungement is not available for a DUI conviction under Illinois law at all. Conflating these four is the single most common mistake I see clients make when they walk into my Springfield office after researching their case online.

How Does a Motion to Suppress Evidence Lead to a Dismissal?

A motion to suppress asks the judge to exclude evidence the police obtained illegally, and if the excluded evidence was the State’s entire case, the State is often left with nothing to prosecute. Illinois law gives a defendant this right under 725 ILCS 5/114-12, which allows a motion when a search or seizure happened without a warrant, or when a warrant existed but was defective on its face, lacked probable cause, or was executed unlawfully.

The statute puts the burden of proof on the defendant to show the search and seizure were unlawful, and the motion has to be filed and argued before trial in most cases. Winning does not automatically end the case. It only makes the suppressed evidence unusable. What happens next is a prosecutorial decision, not a judicial one, and that distinction matters more than most defendants realize.

In Sangamon County, this comes up most often on the initial stop itself. Under the Fourth Amendment and Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), police need reasonable, articulable suspicion of a specific traffic or equipment violation before they can pull a driver over, and they cannot extend that stop beyond its original purpose without independent suspicion. I have watched cases built on a claimed lane deviation collapse once dashcam footage showed the “violation” lasted less than a second and never crossed the fog line. When the stop itself cannot survive scrutiny, everything the officer observed afterward, including field sobriety tests and any chemical test, can go with it.

Can a Faulty Breathalyzer Get an Illinois DUI Case Dismissed?

Yes. Illinois law conditions the admissibility of a breath result on compliance with Illinois State Police testing regulations, and it is the prosecution that must establish that compliance as a matter of foundation — not the defendant who must disprove it. The Illinois Supreme Court applied that principle in People v. Emrich, 113 Ill. 2d 343 (1986), holding that failure to comply with 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2 and the regulations promulgated under it renders chemical test results invalid and inadmissible in a DUI prosecution. Emrich itself involved a blood draw collected without the required anticoagulant and preservative, but the rule it states governs breath testing the same way.

Statute and Regulation Callout — 20 Ill. Adm. Code § 1286.310(a): Before an evidentiary breath test, the operator must continuously observe the subject for at least 20 minutes, during which the subject must be deprived of alcohol and foreign substances and must not have vomited. If the subject vomits during the observation period, the process starts over with the subject rinsing the oral cavity with water. Source: Illinois State Police, 20 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1286, § 1286.310 (amended at 28 Ill. Reg. 10017, effective June 30, 2004).

That June 30, 2004 amendment matters, and most DUI articles get it wrong. The earlier version of the rule said the subject must not have “regurgitated or vomited,” and in People v. Bonutti, 212 Ill. 2d 182 (2004), the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed suppression under that older text where the defendant’s treating physician established that his gastroesophageal reflux disease caused silent, unobservable regurgitation during a clean 20-minute observation. The Court rejected the State’s argument that the officer’s observations are automatically dispositive, holding that the regulation exists to guarantee reliable results, not merely to reward an officer’s diligence. But the regulation was rewritten to reference vomiting only, and the Fourth District confirmed in People v. Lindmark, 381 Ill. App. 3d 638 (2008), that the regulations no longer prohibit regurgitation during the observation period. So a silent-reflux argument tied to the text of the rule no longer works. What survives Bonutti — and it is the more useful half — is the principle the courts still quote: reliability is the paramount concern, and a regulatory box-check does not by itself establish that a reading was accurate.

That distinction, between whether the test complied with the rules and whether the number the machine produced can be trusted, is where a breath test case is actually won or lost. They are two separate challenges, and a defendant can lose the first and still win the second.

A related and often-overlooked trap is anything in the driver’s mouth during the observation window. Illinois defines a “foreign substance” as any substance not already in the subject’s body when the observation period begins, apart from what enters through normal breathing (20 Ill. Adm. Code § 1286.10). Chewing tobacco, a nicotine pouch, or a breath mint fits that definition squarely. Blood from a cut lip is the harder case — and the Illinois Appellate Court addressed exactly that in People v. Ernsting, 2018 IL App (5th) 160330, affirming suppression of a 0.215 breath result and rescission of the accompanying statutory summary suspension. Importantly, the court did not hold that blood is a “foreign substance” under the Code; it observed that the Code’s definition may not reach a substance already in the subject’s body and rested its decision elsewhere. The defendant won because she made a prima facie case that the result was untrustworthy — the officer conceded he never checked her mouth despite being trained to, and her expert testified without rebuttal that blood in the mouth inflates a breath reading — and the State failed to rebut it. We cover the foreign-substance version of this defense, and how it plays out in Sangamon County arrests, in The Skoal, Zyn, or Breath Mint Defense.

Beyond the observation period, the instrument has to have been certified accurate within the preceding 62 days, the operator has to hold a current Breath Analysis Operator license, and the logbook or instrument memory has to reflect those accuracy checks. Any gap in that paper trail is a foundation problem, and foundation problems are where DUI cases in Sangamon County most often fall apart before they ever reach a jury.

Is Winning My License Suspension Hearing the Same as Beating My DUI Charge?

No, and this is the confusion I correct with new clients more than almost anything else. A hearing on a petition to rescind your statutory summary suspension is a civil proceeding, separate from the criminal DUI case, and winning it restores your driving privileges without touching the criminal charge at all.

Statute Callout — 625 ILCS 5/2-118.1: A driver has 90 days from receiving notice of a statutory summary suspension to file a petition to rescind, and the hearing must be held within 30 days of that request or at the first appearance date. The issues at that hearing are narrow: whether the arrest was lawful, whether the officer had reasonable grounds to believe the driver was under the influence, whether proper statutory warnings were given, and whether the test results were valid.

The Illinois Supreme Court set the procedural rules for these hearings in People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 530 N.E.2d 210 (1988), holding that the motorist bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case for rescission, at which point the burden shifts to the State to justify the suspension with evidence, including proper foundation for any chemical test result.

A driver who wins a rescission hearing gets their license back. Their DUI charge under 625 ILCS 5/11-501 is still sitting on the criminal docket, waiting for its own resolution. I have had clients assume a rescission win meant the whole case was over, and had to explain that the two fights are related but legally distinct, running on separate timelines.

What Happens If the State Misses Illinois’ Speedy Trial Deadline?

If the State does not bring a defendant to trial within the statutory window, the charge is dismissed and barred for want of prosecution, and that dismissal happens regardless of how strong the underlying evidence is. Illinois’ speedy trial statute, 725 ILCS 5/103-5, sets that window at 120 days from the date a person is taken into custody, or 160 days from the date of a written demand for trial for a person on pretrial release.

Since Illinois eliminated cash bail under the Pretrial Fairness Act, most DUI defendants are released pretrial rather than held, which makes the 160-day demand track the one that applies to the large majority of Sangamon County DUI cases. That demand has to be made affirmatively, in writing, and the clock stops for delays the defendant causes, including continuances the defense requests to review discovery. This is a strategic decision, not a formality. Demanding trial too early can force a case to trial before the defense has finished picking apart the State’s breath test foundation, while waiting too long can mean sitting through months of uncertainty that a demand could have shortened. Every DUI defendant should have this conversation with their attorney before deciding whether, or when, to demand.

Why Do Prosecutors Actually Dismiss DUI Cases? A Former Prosecutor’s View

Prosecutors dismiss DUI cases when they conclude they cannot meet their burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and that calculation happens well before a case ever reaches a jury. During my time as a Sangamon County prosecutor, I evaluated DUI files the same way any Assistant State’s Attorney does: what does the video actually show, does the officer’s report match the video, will the breath test survive a foundation challenge, and is a witness — usually the arresting officer — going to be available and credible on the trial date.

That last point surprises people. An officer transferring departments, going on extended leave, or simply having a scheduling conflict with a subpoenaed trial date can be enough for a prosecutor to nolle pros a case rather than ask for another continuance that risks blowing the speedy trial deadline. A prosecutor facing a suppressed breath test and a defendant who performed reasonably well on field sobriety tests is often looking at a case that cannot clear reasonable doubt on the impairment theory alone, and dismissing, or offering a plea to a lesser charge like reckless driving, becomes the pragmatic call. This is the office’s characterization of how that discretion typically gets exercised in Sangamon County, based on direct experience on both sides of the docket — not a description of a written policy, because no State’s Attorney’s Office publishes a formula for when it will or will not dismiss a case.

Understanding this changes how a defense should be built. A defense attorney who only prepares for trial is missing the point. The goal, in the majority of cases, is to build a file so weak on foundation or so compromised on evidence that dismissal becomes the prosecutor’s own rational choice, not a concession forced by a judge.

How Do the Different DUI Dismissal Avenues in Illinois Compare?

Six distinct paths can end an Illinois DUI case, each controlled by a different decision-maker and moving on its own timeline: a suppression motion, a breath-test challenge, a video discovery sanction, a missed speedy trial deadline, prosecutorial discretion, and completed court supervision. The table below breaks down who controls each path, what it actually resolves, and how quickly it typically moves. The petition to rescind a summary suspension is listed last, deliberately — not because it ends a case, but because so many people believe it does.

Comparison Table — Every Path at a Glance

Path	Who Controls It	What It Resolves	Typical Timing
Motion to suppress / quash arrest	Judge, on defense motion	Admissibility of stop, arrest, or test evidence	Pretrial, usually 60–120 days after arraignment
Breath test challenge	Judge, on ISP compliance and/or reliability	Admissibility of the BAC result specifically	Pretrial, often argued with the suppression motion
Missing or destroyed video	Judge, as a discovery sanction	Whether the officer can testify about what the video showed	Pretrial, once destruction is discovered
Speedy trial demand	Statutory, self-executing	The entire criminal charge	120 days in custody, or 160 days after a written demand
Prosecutorial discretion (nolle prosequi)	Sangamon County State’s Attorney	The entire criminal charge	Any point before verdict
Court supervision	Judge, with input from both sides	Deferred disposition ending in dismissal after conditions	12–24 months of compliance
Petition to rescind summary suspension	Judge, civil hearing	License suspension only — not the criminal charge	Filed within 90 days of notice

What If My Situation Doesn’t Fit the Standard Playbook?

What if I passed the field sobriety tests but was still arrested?

Passing field sobriety tests does not require the police to release you, because officers can rely on other observations — the odor of alcohol, admitted drinking, or driving pattern — to establish probable cause even with clean SFST results. The Evidence: nothing in 625 ILCS 5/11-501 conditions an arrest on field sobriety performance; probable cause is a totality-of-the-circumstances standard. The Example: I have handled Sangamon County cases where a client performed the walk-and-turn and one-leg stand without a single clue, yet was still arrested on the officer’s subjective assessment of glassy eyes and a faint odor. That gap between what the video shows and what the report claims is often the strongest evidence the defense has, and it is exactly the kind of fact pattern that makes a suppression argument realistic rather than a longshot.

What if the dashcam or body camera footage is missing or was destroyed?

Missing or destroyed video does not automatically dismiss a DUI case, but Illinois courts have sanctioned the State by barring an officer from testifying about what a destroyed recording would have shown. The Evidence: in People v. Kladis, 2011 IL 110920, the Illinois Supreme Court held that a squad-car video is discoverable in a DUI case, and that when the State destroys it after the defense has requested production — even where the destruction followed a routine department purge policy rather than bad faith — barring the officer from testifying about what happened on camera is a proper discovery sanction. The Court was careful to note the sanction is scoped: the officer remained free to testify about the defendant’s conduct before and after the recorded portion, including erratic driving before the stop and observations made after she was placed in the squad car. It is also a sanction aimed at destruction following a discovery request — Illinois courts have declined to extend it to every situation in which no usable recording exists.

Separately, 50 ILCS 706/10-20 requires agencies to retain body-worn camera footage for at least 90 days and prohibits earlier destruction without a documented written record of who destroyed it and why. Critically, an encounter that results in an arrest is a flagged encounter, and flagged recordings cannot be altered or destroyed for two years — and if the recording has been used in a proceeding, not until final disposition and a court order. The Example: the first thing our office does on every DUI file is send a written demand for all available video before any retention window can lapse; when footage later turns out to be missing despite that demand, Kladis is the authority we use to ask the court to bar the officer’s testimony about the stop and arrest, which in a case built on the officer’s on-scene observations can eliminate the State’s strongest evidence of impairment.

What if this is not my first DUI? Can the case still be dismissed?

A prior DUI does not eliminate any of the constitutional or statutory dismissal avenues, but it does close off court supervision and raises the stakes considerably. The Evidence: under 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1(d), a defendant who has previously been convicted of, or received supervision for, a violation of Section 11-501 is not eligible for supervision again, and a second violation carries a mandatory minimum of 5 days in jail or 240 hours of community service under 625 ILCS 5/11-501(c)(2). The Example: a suppression motion, a speedy trial deadline, or a breath test foundation challenge works exactly the same way on a second offense as a first, which means the pretrial fight often matters even more the second time around, since a negotiated supervision outcome is no longer on the table the way it might have been before.

What if I was stopped at a DUI checkpoint or during a coordinated Sangamon County saturation patrol?

A checkpoint stop does not get special protection from suppression; police still have to follow the same constitutional and regulatory rules once the stop turns into a DUI investigation. The Evidence: sobriety checkpoints are constitutional under the Fourth Amendment per Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), but Illinois law enforcement must still follow procedural guidelines for how a checkpoint is publicized, staffed, and documented, and everything downstream of the stop — field sobriety tests, arrest, and any breath test — remains subject to the same suppression and foundation challenges covered above. The Example: Springfield Police and Illinois State Police periodically run coordinated saturation patrols and roadside safety checkpoints in Sangamon County, and the paperwork around those operations, from the checkpoint plan to the individual officer’s arrest report, creates its own set of foundation issues separate from an ordinary traffic stop. We cover what to do at a checkpoint specifically in Flashing Lights in Your Rear-view: Illinois DUI Checkpoints, Stops & What to Do in 2026.

Why Does DUI Dismissal Require Local, Sangamon County Experience?

Because Illinois DUI defense depends on facts specific to the arrest, not a generic checklist. Evaluating a particular squad video, a particular ISP compliance record, and how a particular prosecutor is likely to view a marginal case all require direct local experience, not just a reading of the statute. Every DUI file in Sangamon County moves through the same building, the Sangamon County Courts Complex at 200 South Ninth Street, but the outcome never turns on the address. It turns on whether the stop holds up, whether the breath test paperwork is complete, and whether the State’s Attorney’s Office can put a credible case in front of a jury before the speedy trial clock runs out. No AI Overview, generic legal directory, or out-of-state DUI website can evaluate a specific squad video against 20 Ill. Adm. Code § 1286.310, or judge how a particular Sangamon County prosecutor is likely to view a marginal foundation problem. That judgment comes from having sat on both sides of the table in the Seventh Judicial Circuit for decades, not from reading the statute in isolation.

Have questions about whether your DUI case has a realistic path to dismissal? Call (217) 544-4057 for a free, confidential consultation with W. Scott Hanken, Attorney at Law. We will review your arrest report, video, and test results before your next court date.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Does getting my license suspension rescinded mean my DUI charge is dismissed too?

No. A rescission hearing under 625 ILCS 5/2-118.1 is a separate civil proceeding that only restores your driving privileges. Your criminal DUI charge under 625 ILCS 5/11-501 continues on its own track until it is separately resolved.

Can a first-time DUI in Illinois be completely dismissed?

Yes. First offenses are dismissed through the same avenues as any other DUI: a successful motion to suppress, a breath test that fails on compliance or reliability grounds, a missed speedy trial deadline, or a prosecutor’s own decision that the case cannot be proven. First offenders also have the additional option of court supervision, which is not available on a second charge.

What’s the real difference between a dismissal and court supervision?

A dismissal ends the case immediately, with no conditions attached, and leaves you eligible to expunge the arrest record. Court supervision under 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1(c) keeps the charge open for 12 to 24 months while you complete court-ordered conditions, and only results in a dismissal of the charge once those conditions are finished — but a DUI supervision can never be expunged or sealed. That is a meaningful difference, not a technicality.

How long does it typically take to get a DUI dismissed in Illinois?

There is no single timeline, because it depends on which avenue applies. A speedy trial dismissal is bound by the statutory 120- or 160-day clock, a suppression motion typically resolves within 60 to 120 days after arraignment, and a prosecutor’s independent decision to dismiss can happen at any point before verdict, sometimes not until closer to a trial date once all the evidence has been fully tested.

If the arresting officer doesn’t show up for my court date, will the case automatically get dismissed?

Not automatically, but it can lead there. A judge may grant a continuance to allow the State to secure the officer’s presence, but if unavailability continues and threatens the speedy trial deadline under 725 ILCS 5/103-5, the prosecutor may choose to dismiss rather than risk the case being barred outright.

Can a DUI be dismissed if I was arrested in a parking lot instead of on a public road?

It depends on the specific facts, but “actual physical control” of a vehicle under 625 ILCS 5/11-501 has been interpreted broadly by Illinois courts and is not limited to public highways in every circumstance. This is a fact-specific analysis that should be reviewed with an attorney rather than assumed either way.

Does a dismissed DUI affect my CDL?

A dismissal of the criminal charge does not trigger the conviction-based CDL disqualification under 625 ILCS 5/6-514(a)(3), which requires an actual conviction. But the same statute disqualifies a CDL holder separately for refusing a chemical test under subsection (a)(1), and for a test result over the limit as shown by the officer’s sworn report under subsection (a)(2) — neither of which depends on a conviction. Those have to be challenged on their own, the same way a standard license’s statutory summary suspension does. For more, see DUI Court Supervision Won’t Protect Your Illinois CDL.

Does a dismissed DUI stay on my record?

The arrest record exists independently of the outcome, but a DUI charge that is dismissed, stricken with leave, or resolved by a not-guilty finding is generally eligible for expungement under 20 ILCS 2630/5.2. That is a real advantage over the alternatives: the same statute bars both expungement and sealing for a DUI conviction and for an order of supervision on a DUI. In other words, a dismissal can be cleared from your record and a supervision cannot. That difference is worth fighting for.

Client Reviews

Driving home from St Louis, halfway home my path crossed a Sangamon officer in a little sting among the interstate. I was ticketed and Officer Friendly (not his real name) provided anxiety-provoking information about an upcoming mandatory court date and all of...

jlynno111

Scott resolved my issues beyond expectations. He is not only highly knowledgeable but also takes the time to explain things clearly and thoroughly. His advice is always fair, courteous, and honest. I truly appreciate his professionalism and dedication. Scott’s...

Laura W.

I am writing to strongly recommend Scott Hanken because of his outstanding legal representation in my traffic case. I was cited following a motor vehicle accident for a violation I believed was unjust. From our first consultation through the bench trial, Mr...

Robert S.

Dear Mr. Hanken, I am writing to formally express my sincere appreciation for your exceptional legal representation and dedication in successfully securing the dismissal of the firearm charge in my case. Your professionalism, legal expertise, and attention...

Donald H.

Mr. Hanken is the definition of a genuine person. My experience was nothing short of amazing. Scott made me comfortable and heard from the moment I walked into his office. He gave me back my reputation and dignity by receiving a not guilty verdict, but most...

Nena M.

Scott Hanken saved my life. Prior to this id not been in a situation where I'd needed a lawyer. Throughout the entire process he made sure I was aware of what was going on with my case, what my options were, and was always prompt. He delivered in everything...

Anonymous

If I could give Scott Hanken 6 stars I would, I called 2 weeks prior to my court date with multiple charges against me, He gave me a great price for his services and got my charges dropped. I would personally recommend him to anyone needing legal services.

Scott Hanken has helped me twice in the last year with a couple of legal issues. I was super impressed with his professional attitude, compassion and kindness. His attention to detail and extensive knowledge made a stressful situation much less so and I would...

Sandy

Mr. Hanken is a fantastic attorney who I highly recommend to anyone needing representation. Excellent advocate who will give you peace of mind from the first phone call. Great communication and got me the perfect outcome, all at an extremely fair price. Thank...

Brian W.

Was my first mess up legally and it was pretty major through just what laws I acted against, didn’t know what to expect and was freaking out until my court date. Scott called and let me know that all I have to pay is a fraction of a fine, and a months...

Josiah L.

One of the most difficult and scary times of my life was handled with seamless care. AWESOME JOB I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS LAW FIRM. Scott is a pure professional very knowledgeable and more important The lines of communication were always open, which is very...

Jay T.

Scott is a phenomenal lawyer! He can truly work miracles! He’s a no holds barred kinda guy! Tells you like it is and what he can do for you, then he does it! He was recommended to me and I will recommend him to anyone that needs his services!!!! Scott is...

Rennie B.

Exceptional Follow Up and Support. W.Scott Hanken put me at ease and provided value to my understanding and overall experience. I will not hesitate to use his services if I ever need representation. Thank you so much

Jem

I found myself facing 7 charges and 2 felony charges for reckless driving, fleeing and eluding and sorts. He got ALL of the charges dismissed and I only have to pay a $500 fee and 1 year of court supervision. Nothing on my driving record. He was very...

Alison H.

Working with W. Scott Hanken, Attorney at Law, was outstanding. The firm resolved my case quickly and professionally, kept me informed at every step, and achieved a full dismissal. I recommend them without reservation.

Alex H.

Scott is the best criminal defense lawyer. Never stops trying to get things to the best possible situation for you in a timely manner.

Gannon F.

Scott absolutely amazing the best in Springfield. With an amazing team strongly recommend 10/10.

Sasha A.

They handled everything fast and successfully! answered all my questions I had! stayed in communication the whole time. I would definitely recommend them.

Seth C.

Scott Hanken is a very good lawyer ( best ) . Dependable and always shows up for court . His fees are reasonable . I would hire Mr. Hanken again if i ever would need a lawyer .

Sami S.

I had a small fender bender in Springfield...cops showed up and gave me a failure to reduce speed ticket...i hired Scott to reduce it to a non-moving violation....prosecutor wouldn't budge so Scott had it go to trial...i live in St. Louis...Scott kept me...

Bryan L.

I recently had the pleasure of working with Scott Hanken, who successfully helped me out of a bad situation. I was impressed with Scott's meticulous attention to detail, which made all the difference. I highly recommend Scott to anyone in need of legal...

Holly G.

Scott is a phenomenal attorney. If you find yourself looking for the best criminal defense in Central Illinois, you have without a doubt found your guy. Scott knows the law inside and out and will shoot you straight in every aspect along the way. He is quick...

Austin K.

Coolest Guy and very fluent in defense law. I don’t think anyone can top him honestly. Springfield will miss him if he retires!

Dylan D.

Amazing person, considerate, gets the job done, and is very kind. Not only did Scott provide me with an outcome I wanted, but he was so personally kind to me and helped me feel secure and less stressed. I couldn't be happier with my choice to seek help from an...

Addison S.

Submit a Law Firm Client Review

DUI Dismissal in Illinois: What Actually Gets Cases Dropped

In This Article

What Does “DUI Dismissal” Actually Mean in Illinois?

How Does a Motion to Suppress Evidence Lead to a Dismissal?

Can a Faulty Breathalyzer Get an Illinois DUI Case Dismissed?

Is Winning My License Suspension Hearing the Same as Beating My DUI Charge?

What Happens If the State Misses Illinois’ Speedy Trial Deadline?

Why Do Prosecutors Actually Dismiss DUI Cases? A Former Prosecutor’s View

How Do the Different DUI Dismissal Avenues in Illinois Compare?

What If My Situation Doesn’t Fit the Standard Playbook?

What if I passed the field sobriety tests but was still arrested?

What if the dashcam or body camera footage is missing or was destroyed?

What if this is not my first DUI? Can the case still be dismissed?

What if I was stopped at a DUI checkpoint or during a coordinated Sangamon County saturation patrol?

Why Does DUI Dismissal Require Local, Sangamon County Experience?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Further Reading

Practice Area

Related Articles

Browse by Topic

Topics

Client Reviews

Let's Put Up a Fight.

Leave Us a Message

Address