5 Star Reviews - Google
Best of Springfield (Illinois Times) - 2025
SJR Community Choice - 2025
SJR Community Choice - 2024
Best of Springfield (Illinois Times) - 2023
SJR Community Choice - 2023
Best of Springfield (Illinois Times) - 2022
SJR Community Choice - 2022
Best of Springfield (Illinois Times) - 2020
SJR Community Choice - 2020
Best of Springfield (Illinois Times) - 2019
SJR Community Choice - 2019
Avvo 10.0 Superb - Top Criminal Defense Attorney

5 Steps to Contesting a Failure to Obey Traffic Signal Citation

W. Scott Hanken, Attorney at Law Team

Last Reviewed & Updated: August 11, 2026

By: W. Scott Hanken | Former Sangamon County Prosecutor | Springfield Criminal Defense & Traffic Ticket Defense Attorney | Voted “Best Attorney” — Illinois Times Best of Springfield & State Journal-Register Reader’s Choice | Springfield, IL | Sangamon County | (217) 544-4057 | hankenlaw.com

The short answer: A failure to obey traffic signal citation in Illinois is a petty offense, but a conviction puts 20 points on your public driving record, follows you to your insurance carrier, and counts toward an automatic license suspension. Paying the ticket is a guilty plea. In Sangamon County you have better options — and because Springfield has no red light cameras, every one of these tickets rests on one officer’s account of what he saw.


What a “Failure to Obey Traffic Signal” Citation Actually Charges

There is no single Illinois statute called “failure to obey a traffic signal.” Officers write these tickets under one of four sections of the Illinois Vehicle Code, and which one appears on your citation matters:

StatuteWhat it coversPoints on conviction
625 ILCS 5/11-305Disregarding an official traffic-control device (the catch-all)20
625 ILCS 5/11-306Disregarding a traffic-control light — red, yellow, green, arrows20
625 ILCS 5/11-309Disregarding a flashing red or yellow signal20
625 ILCS 5/11-1204Disregarding a stop or yield sign at an intersection20

Note the difference: stop signs and yield signs are signs, not signals. They are charged under different sections and carry different elements of proof. If your ticket says “traffic signal” but the officer is describing a stop sign, that is worth raising.

Under 625 ILCS 5/11-202, these are petty offenses — no jail exposure. Under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-75(a), the fine may not exceed $1,000. One exception matters: 625 ILCS 5/11-305(f) sets a fine of no less than $100 and no more than $1,000 for a device violation in a designated highway construction or maintenance zone.


Springfield Has No Red Light Cameras — And That Changes Everything

Illinois permits automated red light enforcement in only eight counties. Under 625 ILCS 5/11-208.6(m), the section applies only to Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, Madison, McHenry, St. Clair, and Will Counties and municipalities within them.

Sangamon County is not on that list. If you were ticketed at Sixth and Cook, on Dirksen Parkway, or anywhere else in Springfield, a camera did not catch you — an officer did.

That has three practical consequences:

  • There is a witness, and witnesses can be cross-examined. Your case turns on one person’s vantage point, angle, distance, and attention at a specific moment.
  • You are not fighting a photograph. There is no still image or video the State can put on a screen unless the officer’s squad camera happened to capture it.
  • “I wasn’t driving” works differently here. In camera counties, liability attaches to the registered owner. In Sangamon County the officer identified a driver — so misidentification is a factual dispute about who was behind the wheel, not an ownership technicality.

What a Conviction Actually Costs

The fine is the smallest part of it.

Twenty points, every time. The Illinois Secretary of State’s official offense table at 92 Ill. Adm. Code 1040.20 assigns 20 points to disregarding a traffic control device, a traffic control light, a flashing signal, or a stop or yield sign. For comparison, driving 11–14 mph over the limit is 15 points.

Illinois is not a demerit state. This is the point most drivers get wrong. Your license is not suspended because points pile up. Under 625 ILCS 5/6-206(a)(2), the Secretary of State may suspend or revoke on three or more moving violation convictions in any 12-month period. Under 6-206(a)(36), a driver under 21 at the time of arrest faces the same exposure at two convictions in any 24-month period. Points determine how long the suspension runs — they do not trigger it.

Insurance sees it. A conviction posts to your public driving record. Supervision does not.

If you hold a CDL, the rules are harsher. Under 625 ILCS 5/6-500(8), “conviction” for commercial driver purposes includes the payment of a fine or court cost regardless of whether imposition of sentence is deferred and the charge is ultimately dismissed. Federal regulation 49 CFR 384.226 bars states from masking a CDL holder’s traffic conviction. In plain terms: court supervision does not protect a CDL, and it does not matter that you were in your personal car at the time.


The Real Goal Is Usually Court Supervision, Not “Not Guilty”

Most drivers assume the only two outcomes are pay it or beat it. There is a third, and it is often the best one available.

Court supervision defers judgment. If you complete the supervision period without incident, the case is discharged and dismissed under 730 ILCS 5/5-6-3.1 — no conviction is entered, no points attach, and nothing posts to your public record. The maximum supervision period for a petty offense is two years under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-75(e), though traffic supervision typically runs far shorter.

Supervision is not unlimited, and the restrictions catch people off guard:

  • Two in twelve. Under 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1(k), you are barred from supervision on a moving violation if you have already been assigned supervision on two occasions in the 12 months preceding your arrest date for offenses governing the movement of vehicles.
  • Under 21. Section 5-6-1(h-1) conditions supervision on completing an approved traffic safety program.
  • Under 18. Section 5-6-1(n) requires personal appearance in court plus written consent of a parent or guardian.
  • CDL holders. As above — supervision provides no protection.

Bottom Line: For most Springfield drivers with a clean recent record, negotiating supervision or an amendment to a non-moving violation protects the license far more reliably than gambling on a trial.


5 Steps to Contesting a Failure to Obey Traffic Signal Citation

Step 1: Identify the exact statute charged

Find the code section printed on the citation. Whether you were charged under 11-305, 11-306, 11-309, or 11-1204 determines what the State must prove. Check the date, time, intersection, direction of travel, and vehicle description while the moment is fresh — a charging error is a defense, not a technicality.

Step 2: Preserve evidence before it disappears

Signal timing gets adjusted. Overgrown branches get trimmed. Construction signage comes down. Within days, go back to the intersection at the same time of day and photograph what the driver actually sees on approach: the signal head, sight lines, obstructions, the stop line, and any temporary signage. If your vehicle has a dash camera, pull that footage immediately — most units overwrite on a loop. Note anyone who was in the car with you.

Step 3: Respond by the date on the citation — and do not simply pay it

Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 529, a driver charged with a minor traffic offense that does not require a court appearance may submit a written plea of guilty and pay the assessment set by 705 ILCS 135/15-60, currently $164 for minor traffic. That is convenient — and it is a conviction. Twenty points, publicly reported.

If your citation has the court appearance required box checked, the mail-in option is not available to you. Ignoring the date is the worst outcome of all: it can produce an ex parte judgment of conviction, a failure-to-appear suspension, or a warrant.

Step 4: Choose your posture — trial, supervision, or amendment

Plead not guilty and the case is set for trial. But trial is one of three paths, and it is not automatically the best one. An amendment to a non-moving violation carries zero points. Supervision carries zero points and no public conviction. Which path fits depends on your driving record over the last 12 to 24 months, your age, whether you hold a CDL, and how strong the officer’s account actually is. That analysis is the part worth getting right.

Step 5: Appear prepared, and appear on time

In Sangamon County, drivers with a petty traffic violation who want to request court supervision can use Convenience Traffic Court, held Fridays at noon in Courtroom 1A of the Sangamon County Building. Three limits to know: your citation must already have been filed with the Circuit Clerk by the ticketing agency; you generally need to be scheduled in advance by calling the Clerk’s office at (217) 753-6674; and Convenience Court cannot be used if your ticket arose from a crash involving another vehicle, a person, or property. Misdemeanor traffic, DUI, and criminal misdemeanors are excluded entirely.

Convenience Court is where you request supervision — it is not where you contest the charge. Contesting means a not-guilty plea and a trial setting.


Defenses That Come Straight From the Statute

The strongest arguments in these cases are written into the Vehicle Code itself.

The device wasn’t legible or wasn’t properly positioned. 625 ILCS 5/11-305(c) is explicit: no provision requiring official traffic-control devices may be enforced if, at the time and place of the alleged violation, the device was not in proper position and sufficiently legible to be seen by an ordinarily observant person. A signal blocked by a tree limb, a sign turned by wind, or a temporary device knocked askew is a statutory bar to enforcement — not a plea for sympathy.

The presumption of proper placement is rebuttable. Under 11-305(d), a device that appears to conform is presumed to have been lawfully placed — “unless the contrary shall be established by competent evidence.” That presumption can be attacked.

Yellow is a warning, not a prohibition. This surprises people. 625 ILCS 5/11-306(b)(1) provides that a driver facing a steady yellow is thereby warned that the green movement is terminating. The statute does not make entering the intersection on yellow unlawful. If you entered on yellow, the State’s theory has a problem.

Right on red is lawful. Under 11-306(c)(3), after stopping as required, a driver may cautiously turn right on a steady red — unless a sign prohibits it and a local ordinance or state rule backs that sign up. The burden is on the State to establish the prohibition, not on you to have noticed it.

The dead red. Under 11-306(c)(3.5), in municipalities under 2,000,000 residents — which includes Springfield — a motorcycle or bicycle facing a red that fails to change within a reasonable time of not less than 120 seconds, because of a malfunction or because the signal never detected the vehicle’s size or weight, may proceed after yielding to oncoming traffic.

A dark signal is a stop sign. Under 11-305(e), a driver approaching a signal with no light illuminated must stop under the rules that apply at a stop sign — not remain frozen at the intersection.

The officer’s vantage point. Where was the squad car? What was the sight angle to the signal head? Was there traffic between the officer and your vehicle? These are ordinary cross-examination questions, and in a case with no camera, they are the case.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is failure to obey a traffic signal a moving violation in Illinois?

Yes. It carries 20 points and counts toward the conviction thresholds in 625 ILCS 5/6-206 that trigger a license suspension.

Does Springfield have red light cameras?

No. Automated red light enforcement is authorized in only eight Illinois counties under 625 ILCS 5/11-208.6(m), and Sangamon County is not among them. Every signal ticket in Springfield is officer-issued.

Can I just pay the ticket online and move on?

You can, but paying is a guilty plea. It produces a conviction, 20 points, and a public record entry your insurance carrier can see. If you have had other moving violations recently, that third conviction inside 12 months can cost you your license.

How many traffic tickets before my license is suspended in Illinois?

Three moving violation convictions in any 12-month period if you are 21 or older. Two convictions in any 24-month period if you were under 21 at the time of arrest. Supervision is not a conviction and does not count.

What if the light turned yellow just as I entered the intersection?

Under 625 ILCS 5/11-306(b)(1), a steady yellow warns that the green is ending. It does not prohibit entering the intersection. Whether the light was yellow or red when you crossed the stop line is often the entire dispute.

My motorcycle never triggered the green. Is that a defense?

It can be. In municipalities under 2,000,000 residents, 625 ILCS 5/11-306(c)(3.5) allows a motorcycle or bicycle to proceed through a red that fails to change within not less than 120 seconds due to malfunction or failure to detect the vehicle, after yielding to oncoming traffic.

I have a CDL. Does court supervision protect me?

No. Under 625 ILCS 5/6-500(8), a deferred disposition still counts as a conviction for commercial driving purposes, and 49 CFR 384.226 prohibits masking. This applies even if you were driving your personal vehicle. CDL holders should treat any moving violation as a threat to their livelihood and get counsel immediately.

Do I have to appear in person in Sangamon County?

It depends on your citation and your objective. If the court appearance box is checked, yes. If you are seeking supervision on a non-accident petty traffic violation, Sangamon County’s Convenience Traffic Court on Friday afternoons may be an option. Remote appearance rules have also expanded — check with the Circuit Clerk for your specific case.


Further Reading

Practice Area

Related Articles

Browse by Topic


Ready to Fight Your Traffic Case in Springfield?
Call W. Scott Hanken at (217) 544-4057 or contact us online for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Springfield, Sangamon County, and Central Illinois.

About the Author: W. Scott Hanken, Attorney at Law
Scott Hanken is a Springfield, Illinois criminal defense attorney with over 37 years of experience, including service as a former Sangamon County prosecutor. He has been voted Best Attorney by the Illinois Times and State Journal-Register, holds an Avvo 10.0 “Superb” rating, and has earned over 270 five-star Google reviews. He serves clients throughout Sangamon County and Central Illinois.

📍 1100 S 5th St, Springfield, IL 62703 | ☎ (217) 544-4057 | 🌐 hankenlaw.com

This article is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique — contact an experienced Springfield criminal defense attorney for guidance on your specific situation.

Client Reviews

Driving home from St Louis, halfway home my path crossed a Sangamon officer in a little sting among the interstate. I was ticketed and Officer Friendly (not his real name) provided anxiety-provoking information about an upcoming mandatory court date and all of...

jlynno111

Scott resolved my issues beyond expectations. He is not only highly knowledgeable but also takes the time to explain things clearly and thoroughly. His advice is always fair, courteous, and honest. I truly appreciate his professionalism and dedication. Scott’s...

Laura W.

I am writing to strongly recommend Scott Hanken because of his outstanding legal representation in my traffic case. I was cited following a motor vehicle accident for a violation I believed was unjust. From our first consultation through the bench trial, Mr...

Robert S.

Dear Mr. Hanken, I am writing to formally express my sincere appreciation for your exceptional legal representation and dedication in successfully securing the dismissal of the firearm charge in my case. Your professionalism, legal expertise, and attention...

Donald H.

Mr. Hanken is the definition of a genuine person. My experience was nothing short of amazing. Scott made me comfortable and heard from the moment I walked into his office. He gave me back my reputation and dignity by receiving a not guilty verdict, but most...

Nena M.

Scott Hanken saved my life. Prior to this id not been in a situation where I'd needed a lawyer. Throughout the entire process he made sure I was aware of what was going on with my case, what my options were, and was always prompt. He delivered in everything...

Anonymous

If I could give Scott Hanken 6 stars I would, I called 2 weeks prior to my court date with multiple charges against me, He gave me a great price for his services and got my charges dropped. I would personally recommend him to anyone needing legal services.

Anonymous

Scott Hanken has helped me twice in the last year with a couple of legal issues. I was super impressed with his professional attitude, compassion and kindness. His attention to detail and extensive knowledge made a stressful situation much less so and I would...

Sandy

Mr. Hanken is a fantastic attorney who I highly recommend to anyone needing representation. Excellent advocate who will give you peace of mind from the first phone call. Great communication and got me the perfect outcome, all at an extremely fair price. Thank...

Brian W.

Was my first mess up legally and it was pretty major through just what laws I acted against, didn’t know what to expect and was freaking out until my court date. Scott called and let me know that all I have to pay is a fraction of a fine, and a months...

Josiah L.

One of the most difficult and scary times of my life was handled with seamless care. AWESOME JOB I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS LAW FIRM. Scott is a pure professional very knowledgeable and more important The lines of communication were always open, which is very...

Jay T.

Scott is a phenomenal lawyer! He can truly work miracles! He’s a no holds barred kinda guy! Tells you like it is and what he can do for you, then he does it! He was recommended to me and I will recommend him to anyone that needs his services!!!! Scott is...

Rennie B.

Exceptional Follow Up and Support. W.Scott Hanken put me at ease and provided value to my understanding and overall experience. I will not hesitate to use his services if I ever need representation. Thank you so much

Jem

I found myself facing 7 charges and 2 felony charges for reckless driving, fleeing and eluding and sorts. He got ALL of the charges dismissed and I only have to pay a $500 fee and 1 year of court supervision. Nothing on my driving record. He was very...

Alison H.

Working with W. Scott Hanken, Attorney at Law, was outstanding. The firm resolved my case quickly and professionally, kept me informed at every step, and achieved a full dismissal. I recommend them without reservation.

Alex H.

Scott is the best criminal defense lawyer. Never stops trying to get things to the best possible situation for you in a timely manner.

Gannon F.

Scott absolutely amazing the best in Springfield. With an amazing team strongly recommend 10/10.

Sasha A.

They handled everything fast and successfully! answered all my questions I had! stayed in communication the whole time. I would definitely recommend them.

Seth C.

Scott Hanken is a very good lawyer ( best ) . Dependable and always shows up for court . His fees are reasonable . I would hire Mr. Hanken again if i ever would need a lawyer .

Sami S.

I had a small fender bender in Springfield...cops showed up and gave me a failure to reduce speed ticket...i hired Scott to reduce it to a non-moving violation....prosecutor wouldn't budge so Scott had it go to trial...i live in St. Louis...Scott kept me...

Bryan L.

I recently had the pleasure of working with Scott Hanken, who successfully helped me out of a bad situation. I was impressed with Scott's meticulous attention to detail, which made all the difference. I highly recommend Scott to anyone in need of legal...

Holly G.

Scott is a phenomenal attorney. If you find yourself looking for the best criminal defense in Central Illinois, you have without a doubt found your guy. Scott knows the law inside and out and will shoot you straight in every aspect along the way. He is quick...

Austin K.

Coolest Guy and very fluent in defense law. I don’t think anyone can top him honestly. Springfield will miss him if he retires!

Dylan D.

Amazing person, considerate, gets the job done, and is very kind. Not only did Scott provide me with an outcome I wanted, but he was so personally kind to me and helped me feel secure and less stressed. I couldn't be happier with my choice to seek help from an...

Addison S.

Let's Put Up a Fight.

Fill out the contact form or call us at (217) 544-4057
to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

Address

Our offices are located at the corner of South Fifth Street and Vine, in the historic Mary Bryant Home for the Blind.

Springfield Office
1100 S 5th St

Springfield, IL 62703