Illinois High Crime Area Stop Rules

Last Reviewed & Updated: November 4, 2026

No. In Illinois, standing or driving in a high crime area is not enough, by itself, for police to stop you. An officer needs reasonable suspicion that you personally are involved in a crime. The neighborhood is one factor. Running from police can tip the balance.

Bottom Line: Police can walk up and talk to anyone, anywhere, without any suspicion at all. What they cannot do is hold you there, frisk you, or order you out of a parked car simply because of your zip code. If a Springfield officer detained you in what the report calls a high crime neighborhood, and that label is the only explanation, the stop may be unconstitutional, and the evidence from it may be suppressed in the Sangamon County Circuit Court.

Can Police Stop You Just Because You’re in a High Crime Area in Illinois?

No. Whether an officer calls it a high crime area or you call it a bad neighborhood, your location alone never justifies a Terry stop in Illinois.

The rule comes from the United States Supreme Court, in a case that started in Chicago. In Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000), the Court held that a person’s presence in an area of expected criminal activity, standing alone, does not support a reasonable, particularized suspicion that the person is committing a crime. Two decades earlier, in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979), the Court threw out a stop where officers saw a man walking in a known drug area and decided he “looked suspicious.” That was not enough then, and it is not enough now.

The key word is particularized. The officer must be able to point to something about you: what you did, what you carried, what you said, or how you reacted. The neighborhood can add weight to those facts. It cannot replace them.

In a Sangamon County suppression hearing, the question is whether the officer had reasonable suspicion beyond the high crime area itself: what made you, specifically, suspicious? When the honest answer is “he was standing there,” the stop fails.

In Springfield, the Springfield Police Department’s street crimes unit often increases its presence in areas it deems high crime, especially when officers believe a pop-up party is occurring. More officers on the block means more encounters. It does not lower the legal standard for any one of them.

What Is the Difference Between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause?

Reasonable suspicion lets police briefly detain you. Probable cause lets them arrest you or search you.

Courts sort police contact into three tiers. The Illinois Supreme Court laid them out in People v. Luedemann, 222 Ill. 2d 530 (2006): an arrest, which requires probable cause; a brief investigative detention, which requires reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity; and a consensual encounter, which requires nothing because you are free to leave.

Reasonable suspicion means specific, articulable facts that would lead a reasonable officer to suspect criminal activity is happening, about to happen, or just happened. It is more than a hunch, but far less than proof. It comes from Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), which is why a brief detention is called a “Terry stop.”
Probable cause means facts sufficient for a reasonable person to believe a crime has been committed and that you committed it (for an arrest), or that evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place (for a search).

Statute Callout — 725 ILCS 5/107-14, Temporary Questioning Without Arrest: Section 107-14(a) allows an officer, after identifying himself, to stop a person in a public place for a reasonable period of time when the officer reasonably infers from the circumstances that the person is committing, is about to commit, or has committed an offense. The officer may demand the person’s name and address and an explanation of his actions. Subsection (b) requires the officer to hand you a stop receipt listing the reason for the stop, the officer’s name, and badge number whenever the stop involves a frisk or search, unless that is impractical, impossible, or barred by exigent circumstances. Last amended by P.A. 99-352, effective January 1, 2016.

This section is Illinois’ codified Terry stop; “reasonably infers” is reasonable suspicion in statutory form.

Can Police Talk to You Without Any Reason at All?

Yes. Any officer can approach you in public and ask questions without suspicion of anything.

That is the consensual encounter tier recognized in Luedemann. You can answer, decline to answer, or walk away.

The encounter becomes a seizure when a reasonable person would no longer feel free to leave. Illinois courts look at the factors first listed in United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980): the threatening presence of several officers, a displayed weapon, physical touching, or language or tone that signals compliance is required. Once those features appear, the officer needs reasonable suspicion.

The practical test on a Springfield sidewalk is simple. Ask, calmly, “Am I free to go?” If the answer is yes, leave. If the answer is no, you are detained, and the officer will later have to justify that detention in court.

When Can Police Stop You While You’re Walking on a Sidewalk or Street?

Police can stop a pedestrian when they have reasonable suspicion of a crime, or when they see you commit an ordinance or traffic violation.

Walking is not a crime, but the Illinois Vehicle Code governs pedestrians too. Under 625 ILCS 5/11-1007(a), where a sidewalk is provided and its use is practicable, it is unlawful to walk along the adjacent roadway. Where there is no sidewalk, you must use the shoulder; where there is neither, you must walk as near as practicable to the outside edge and, on a two-way road, on the left side. Last amended by P.A. 97-1023, effective January 1, 2013.

Common lawful reasons to stop a pedestrian include:

Walking in the street when a usable sidewalk is right there (625 ILCS 5/11-1007)
Matching a specific description of a suspect in a recent, nearby crime
An officer seeing what looks like a hand-to-hand exchange
A visible weapon or a bulge consistent with a firearm, combined with other facts
An outstanding warrant the officer already knows about

What is not a lawful reason: standing on a corner, walking at night, being young, looking at a squad car, or being in a neighborhood the officer considers rough. A roadway-walking stop is legitimate, but it can quickly turn into questioning and a frisk, so what happened after the stop matters as much as the stop itself.

In my practice, I often handle cases where the encounter began because the person was walking in the street, jaywalking, or otherwise making it easy for the police to engage. Combined with stepped-up patrols around a suspected pop-up party, that is how a walk down the block becomes a street stop. The simplest protection is also the most effective: stay on the sidewalk and cross at the corner.

When Can Police Stop You While You’re Driving?

Police can pull over a car for any traffic violation, however minor, even if the real reason is something else.

In Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), the Supreme Court held that a traffic stop is valid when the officer has probable cause to believe a traffic violation occurred, regardless of the officer’s actual motive. Illinois requires even less: in People v. Hackett, 2012 IL 111781, the Illinois Supreme Court held that a traffic stop can also rest on reasonable, articulable suspicion that a violation occurred.

A single burned-out bulb is enough. Under 625 ILCS 5/12-201(c), your rear registration plate must be lit with a white light so it is clearly legible from 50 feet. Last amended by P.A. 103-706, effective January 1, 2025.

What police cannot do is stop cars at random. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979) prohibits stopping a motorist just to check license and registration without suspicion. Driving through a high crime area at 2 a.m., without a violation, is not a basis for a stop.

The stop must also stay on task. Under Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015), police cannot prolong a traffic stop beyond the time reasonably needed to handle the traffic violation, for example to wait for a drug dog, unless they have independent reasonable suspicion. In a Sangamon County suppression hearing, the time stamps on the squad video often decide whether the stop was unlawfully prolonged.

What If You’re a Passenger, or Sitting in a Parked Car?

A passenger is seized during a traffic stop just like the driver. A person sitting in a parked car is not seized merely because an officer walks up.

Passengers: Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007) holds that a passenger is seized when the car is stopped, which means a passenger can challenge an unlawful stop. Officers may order both the driver and passengers out of the car during a lawful stop (Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977); Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)).

Parked cars: An officer may approach a parked car and ask questions as a consensual encounter. A separate “community caretaking” doctrine lets an officer check on a driver for safety reasons unrelated to crime, as in People v. McDonough, 239 Ill. 2d 260 (2010), where an officer pulled behind a car stopped on the roadside to offer help. The encounter changes character when the officer boxes the car in, activates emergency lights to signal you cannot leave, or orders you out. At that point you have been seized, and the officer needs reasonable suspicion of a crime, unless the officer is genuinely acting to protect safety rather than to investigate. In McDonough, the officer turned on his emergency lights, and the court upheld the seizure as community caretaking.

In a Springfield parking lot case, where the squad car was positioned, and when the emergency lights came on, can decide whether a consensual encounter became an unlawful seizure.

When Can Police Stop You on a Bicycle?

The same way they can stop a car: for a traffic violation or reasonable suspicion.

Under 625 ILCS 5/11-1507(a), a bicycle used at nighttime must have a front lamp emitting white light visible from at least 500 feet and a rear red reflector (or a red light visible from 500 feet). Last amended by P.A. 100-359, effective January 1, 2018.

A missing headlight on a bike at night is a lawful basis to stop the rider. A bicycle in a high crime area, at night, with proper lights, is not.

Types of Police Contact at a Glance

Type of contact	What police need	Can you leave?	Springfield example
Consensual encounter	Nothing	Yes	Officer asks a group on a porch what’s going on
Community caretaking	A safety concern unrelated to crime	Not until the safety concern is resolved	Officer checks on a car parked on the shoulder of I-55 with hazards on
Investigative (Terry) stop	Reasonable, articulable suspicion	No, for a reasonable time	Person matches the description of a robbery suspect two blocks away
Frisk (pat-down)	Reasonable suspicion you are armed and dangerous	No	Bulge at the waistband plus a report of a man with a gun
Traffic stop	Reasonable suspicion or probable cause of a traffic violation	No	Plate light out on Clear Lake Avenue
Arrest	Probable cause of a crime	No	Officer sees a drug sale in progress
Search	Warrant, consent, or a recognized exception (often probable cause)	No	Probable cause based on what the officer saw in plain view

Note: Under Hackett, a traffic stop needs only reasonable suspicion of a violation. Some vehicle stops that are not based on any traffic violation can also rest on reasonable suspicion, such as the roadblock-avoidance stop upheld in People v. Timmsen, 2016 IL 118181, discussed below.

When Can Police Frisk You?

Only when they reasonably believe you are armed and dangerous. A lawful stop does not automatically allow a pat-down.

Statute Callout — 725 ILCS 5/108-1.01, Search During Temporary Questioning: Section 108-1.01 allows an officer who has stopped a person under Section 107-14, and who reasonably suspects that he or another person is in danger of attack, to search the person for weapons. If the officer finds a weapon, he may hold it until questioning ends, then either return it if lawfully possessed or arrest the person. Source: Laws 1968, p. 218; unamended since enactment.

The frisk is limited to a pat of outer clothing for weapons. It is not a search for drugs. And being in a high crime area does not, on its own, make you dangerous. In Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), another case out of Illinois, police with a warrant to search a tavern frisked every patron. The Supreme Court held that mere presence near people suspected of crime does not justify searching you.

If you were frisked in Springfield, Section 107-14(b) required the officer to give you a stop receipt with the reason for the stop, his name, and his badge number. Keep it; if you never received one, tell your lawyer.

What If You Ran From the Police in a High Crime Area?

Running changes the analysis. Unprovoked flight plus a high crime area can supply reasonable suspicion.

That was the actual holding of Wardlow. The officers were driving in a caravan through a West Side Chicago neighborhood known for narcotics. Wardlow looked at them and ran. The Court held that unprovoked flight is the kind of nervous, evasive behavior that, combined with the location, justified a stop. The Illinois Supreme Court applied similar reasoning to drivers in Timmsen, holding that a U-turn 50 feet before a police roadblock, under the circumstances, supported reasonable suspicion.

Two details matter in defending these cases:

“Unprovoked” is doing real work. Walking away from a consensual encounter is your right. Leaving because an officer is yelling, chasing, or reaching for you is a different fact pattern than bolting at the first sight of a squad car.
You are not seized until you submit or an officer physically restrains you. A seizure happens when you submit to an officer’s show of authority, or when an officer applies physical force intending to restrain you, even if you keep running (Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. 306 (2021)). Under California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), anything you toss while running before that point is generally treated as abandoned. That is why a thrown bag in a Springfield foot chase is so hard to suppress.

What If You Refuse to Give Police Your Name?

During a lawful stop, police can demand your name. Refusing is not, by itself, a crime under Section 107-14. Lying about it is.

Section 107-14(a) authorizes the officer to demand your name, address, and an explanation of your actions, but the section contains no penalty for silence. The General Assembly has considered bills that would have criminalized a refusal; none of those penalty provisions appears in the current statute. By contrast, 720 ILCS 5/31-4.5 makes it a Class A misdemeanor to knowingly give a false name, address, or date of birth to an officer who has lawfully arrested or lawfully detained you. Added by P.A. 96-335, effective January 1, 2010. A Class A misdemeanor carries up to 364 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,500 under 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55.

Read those two statutes together and the rule is clear. Silence carries risk; a false name is a crime. Notice also the word “lawfully” in 31-4.5. If the detention itself was unlawful, the State has a problem proving the obstructing identification charge. The practical advice: give your true name, then stop talking. Refusing can escalate quickly into a resisting or obstructing charge; see my post on resisting or obstructing a peace officer in Illinois.

What If the Officer Says He Smelled Cannabis?

The answer depends on whether the officer claims the odor was burnt or raw.

In People v. Redmond, 2024 IL 129201, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the odor of burnt cannabis alone is not probable cause to search a vehicle; officers must rely on the totality of the circumstances. Three months later, in People v. Molina, 2024 IL 129237, the Court held that the odor of raw cannabis coming from a vehicle is probable cause to search, so long as the officer is trained and experienced in telling raw from burnt. The reasoning: Illinois still requires cannabis in a vehicle to be in a sealed, odor-proof container.

Senate Bill 42, which would bar stops and searches of drivers 21 and older based solely on cannabis odor, passed the Illinois Senate in 2025. ILGA lists its last action as a re-referral to the House Rules Committee on May 23, 2025. It is not law. Until it is, Molina controls in every Illinois courtroom, including the Sangamon County Circuit Court.

For the DUI side of cannabis stops, see my post on cannabis DUI and implied consent in Springfield.

What Should You Do If Police Stop You in a High Crime Area in Springfield?

Stay calm, ask whether you are free to go, give your true name, and do not consent to any search.

Each of those steps tracks the law above. The question “Am I free to go?” tells you which tier you are in. Your true name satisfies 725 ILCS 5/107-14 and keeps you clear of an obstructing identification charge under 720 ILCS 5/31-4.5. Refusing consent preserves your Fourth Amendment challenge for the Sangamon County Circuit Court.

Here is the short version to remember:

Ask, calmly: “Officer, am I free to go?”
If yes, walk away. Do not run.
If no, give your true name and address, then say: “I’m going to remain silent. I would like to speak with a lawyer.”
Say clearly: “I do not consent to any searches.” Do not physically resist, even if the officer searches anyway.
If you are frisked, ask for your stop receipt under 107-14(b).
Stay on the sidewalk and cross at the corner, especially where officers are patrolling heavily.
Write down the time, location, officers’ names, and any witnesses as soon as you can.

Arguing the law on the street does not win the case. Preserving the facts does, and the place to argue is in court.

What Can You Do If Police Stopped You Illegally in Sangamon County?

You can ask the court to suppress the evidence. If the stop was unlawful, what police found because of it can be thrown out.

The tool is a motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence, filed in the Sangamon County Circuit Court. The defense bears the initial burden of showing the stop or search occurred without a warrant and was unreasonable; the State then has to justify it. The officer testifies, and the defense cross-examines. In a high crime area case, the cross-examination usually focuses on four questions:

What specific facts, about this person, did you observe before you detained him?
How do you define “high crime area,” and what data supports that label for this block, on this date?
When, exactly, did the detention begin? (Squad video and body camera time stamps answer this.)
Did you provide a stop receipt under 107-14(b)?

If the judge grants the motion, the gun, the drugs, or the statement may be excluded. In many cases, that ends the prosecution. When the State relies on license plate readers to explain why officers were watching a car, see my post on Flock cameras and warrants in Illinois.

Key Takeaways:

A high crime area, alone, is never enough for a stop in Illinois (Wardlow; Brown v. Texas).
A detention needs reasonable suspicion; an arrest needs probable cause.
Any traffic violation, even a dark plate light, justifies a car stop (Whren; 625 ILCS 5/12-201(c)).
A frisk requires reasonable suspicion that you are armed and dangerous, and triggers a stop receipt.
Unprovoked flight in a high crime area can create reasonable suspicion.
Giving a false name to an officer during a lawful detention is a Class A misdemeanor (720 ILCS 5/31-4.5).

Primary Authorities

725 ILCS 5/107-14 (Temporary questioning without arrest), P.A. 99-352, eff. 1-1-16
725 ILCS 5/108-1.01 (Search during temporary questioning), Laws 1968, p. 218
720 ILCS 5/31-4.5 (Obstructing identification), P.A. 96-335, eff. 1-1-10
730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55 (Class A misdemeanors; sentence)
625 ILCS 5/11-1007 (Pedestrians walking on highways), P.A. 97-1023, eff. 1-1-13
625 ILCS 5/11-1507 (Lamps and other equipment on bicycles), P.A. 100-359, eff. 1-1-18
625 ILCS 5/12-201 (When lighted lamps are required), P.A. 103-706, eff. 1-1-25
Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000)
Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979)
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980)
Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996)
Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)
Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015)
Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007)
Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977)
Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)
Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979)
Torres v. Madrid, 592 U.S. 306 (2021)
California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991)
People v. Luedemann, 222 Ill. 2d 530 (2006)
People v. McDonough, 239 Ill. 2d 260 (2010)
People v. Hackett, 2012 IL 111781
People v. Timmsen, 2016 IL 118181
People v. Redmond, 2024 IL 129201
People v. Molina, 2024 IL 129237
Senate Bill 42, 104th General Assembly (pending)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can police stop you for being in a bad neighborhood in Illinois?

No. Being in a high crime neighborhood, even at night, is not enough. Time of night and neighborhood are factors, but they do not justify a stop unless the officer also observed specific conduct suggesting you were involved in a crime. Under Wardlow and Brown v. Texas, location and time alone fail.

Do I have to answer police questions on the street in Springfield?

No. In a consensual encounter you can decline to answer and walk away. During a lawful Terry stop, the officer may demand your name, address, and an explanation under 725 ILCS 5/107-14, but you keep your Fifth Amendment right to remain silent about everything else. Give your true name and say you would like to speak with a lawyer.

Can police search my car because they say it’s a high crime area?

No. A vehicle search generally requires consent, a warrant, or probable cause that evidence is inside. Location does not supply probable cause. You can say, calmly, “I do not consent to any searches.” Do not physically resist.

Is it illegal to walk away from a police officer in Illinois?

Not during a consensual encounter. If you are not detained, you are free to leave. If you have been lawfully detained, walking away can lead to a resisting or obstructing charge. Ask “Am I free to go?” before you move.

What is a stop receipt, and should I have gotten one?

Under 725 ILCS 5/107-14(b), an officer who frisks or searches you during a street stop must give you a receipt stating the reason for the stop, his name, and badge number, unless that is impractical, impossible, or prevented by exigent circumstances. If you were patted down and did not receive one, tell your defense attorney.

What happens if the court finds my stop was illegal?

The judge can suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the stop. Without that evidence, prosecutors in Sangamon County frequently dismiss the charge or cannot prove the case at trial.

Client Reviews

Driving home from St Louis, halfway home my path crossed a Sangamon officer in a little sting among the interstate. I was ticketed and Officer Friendly (not his real name) provided anxiety-provoking information about an upcoming mandatory court date and all of...

jlynno111

Scott resolved my issues beyond expectations. He is not only highly knowledgeable but also takes the time to explain things clearly and thoroughly. His advice is always fair, courteous, and honest. I truly appreciate his professionalism and dedication. Scott’s...

Laura W.

I am writing to strongly recommend Scott Hanken because of his outstanding legal representation in my traffic case. I was cited following a motor vehicle accident for a violation I believed was unjust. From our first consultation through the bench trial, Mr...

Robert S.

Dear Mr. Hanken, I am writing to formally express my sincere appreciation for your exceptional legal representation and dedication in successfully securing the dismissal of the firearm charge in my case. Your professionalism, legal expertise, and attention...

Donald H.

Mr. Hanken is the definition of a genuine person. My experience was nothing short of amazing. Scott made me comfortable and heard from the moment I walked into his office. He gave me back my reputation and dignity by receiving a not guilty verdict, but most...

Nena M.

Scott Hanken saved my life. Prior to this id not been in a situation where I'd needed a lawyer. Throughout the entire process he made sure I was aware of what was going on with my case, what my options were, and was always prompt. He delivered in everything...

Anonymous

If I could give Scott Hanken 6 stars I would, I called 2 weeks prior to my court date with multiple charges against me, He gave me a great price for his services and got my charges dropped. I would personally recommend him to anyone needing legal services.

Scott Hanken has helped me twice in the last year with a couple of legal issues. I was super impressed with his professional attitude, compassion and kindness. His attention to detail and extensive knowledge made a stressful situation much less so and I would...

Sandy

Mr. Hanken is a fantastic attorney who I highly recommend to anyone needing representation. Excellent advocate who will give you peace of mind from the first phone call. Great communication and got me the perfect outcome, all at an extremely fair price. Thank...

Brian W.

Was my first mess up legally and it was pretty major through just what laws I acted against, didn’t know what to expect and was freaking out until my court date. Scott called and let me know that all I have to pay is a fraction of a fine, and a months...

Josiah L.

One of the most difficult and scary times of my life was handled with seamless care. AWESOME JOB I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS LAW FIRM. Scott is a pure professional very knowledgeable and more important The lines of communication were always open, which is very...

Jay T.

Scott is a phenomenal lawyer! He can truly work miracles! He’s a no holds barred kinda guy! Tells you like it is and what he can do for you, then he does it! He was recommended to me and I will recommend him to anyone that needs his services!!!! Scott is...

Rennie B.

Exceptional Follow Up and Support. W.Scott Hanken put me at ease and provided value to my understanding and overall experience. I will not hesitate to use his services if I ever need representation. Thank you so much

Jem

I found myself facing 7 charges and 2 felony charges for reckless driving, fleeing and eluding and sorts. He got ALL of the charges dismissed and I only have to pay a $500 fee and 1 year of court supervision. Nothing on my driving record. He was very...

Alison H.

Working with W. Scott Hanken, Attorney at Law, was outstanding. The firm resolved my case quickly and professionally, kept me informed at every step, and achieved a full dismissal. I recommend them without reservation.

Alex H.

Scott is the best criminal defense lawyer. Never stops trying to get things to the best possible situation for you in a timely manner.

Gannon F.

Scott absolutely amazing the best in Springfield. With an amazing team strongly recommend 10/10.

Sasha A.

They handled everything fast and successfully! answered all my questions I had! stayed in communication the whole time. I would definitely recommend them.

Seth C.

Scott Hanken is a very good lawyer ( best ) . Dependable and always shows up for court . His fees are reasonable . I would hire Mr. Hanken again if i ever would need a lawyer .

Sami S.

I had a small fender bender in Springfield...cops showed up and gave me a failure to reduce speed ticket...i hired Scott to reduce it to a non-moving violation....prosecutor wouldn't budge so Scott had it go to trial...i live in St. Louis...Scott kept me...

Bryan L.

I recently had the pleasure of working with Scott Hanken, who successfully helped me out of a bad situation. I was impressed with Scott's meticulous attention to detail, which made all the difference. I highly recommend Scott to anyone in need of legal...

Holly G.

Scott is a phenomenal attorney. If you find yourself looking for the best criminal defense in Central Illinois, you have without a doubt found your guy. Scott knows the law inside and out and will shoot you straight in every aspect along the way. He is quick...

Austin K.

Coolest Guy and very fluent in defense law. I don’t think anyone can top him honestly. Springfield will miss him if he retires!

Dylan D.

Amazing person, considerate, gets the job done, and is very kind. Not only did Scott provide me with an outcome I wanted, but he was so personally kind to me and helped me feel secure and less stressed. I couldn't be happier with my choice to seek help from an...

Addison S.

Submit a Law Firm Client Review

Can Police Stop You for Being in a High Crime Area?